How NASH differs from NAFLD. What drives progression to NASH? 5

How NASH differs from NAFLD. What drives progression to NASH? 5

Can we help?

Leading expert in liver disease, Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, explains how non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) differs from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). He details the key drivers of progression from simple liver fat to the more serious NASH. Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, discusses the critical roles of inflammation, cell injury, and scarring. He also highlights important risk factors like diabetes and genetics.

Understanding NASH: Progression from Fatty Liver Disease to Advanced Liver Scarring

Jump To Section

NASH vs NAFLD: Key Differences in Liver Disease

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) represents a significant progression from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, clarifies that NAFLD serves as an umbrella term. Most patients under this umbrella have simple fat accumulation in the liver, a condition sometimes called non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL).

NASH is defined by a more complex pathological picture. It involves not just fat but also liver inflammation, injury to hepatocytes (liver cells), and the initial development of scarring (fibrosis). This triad of inflammation, injury, and fibrosis distinguishes NASH from the more benign simple steatosis. Dr. Anton Titov, MD, in his interview with Dr. Friedman, sought to understand this critical distinction in liver disease severity.

What Drives Progression from NAFLD to NASH?

The mechanisms driving the progression from simple NAFLD to NASH remain a central question in hepatology. Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, notes that while most patients with liver fat do not progress, a concerning subset does. This progression elevates the risk for serious liver complications, including cirrhosis and liver cancer.

The transition is not fully understood, but it represents a shift from a relatively inert state of fat storage to an active state of liver cell damage. Identifying the triggers for this shift is a major focus of current research. Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, emphasizes that uncovering these drivers is essential for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Diabetes as a Major Risk Factor for NASH

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a well-established and powerful risk factor for the development of NASH. The metabolic dysfunction associated with diabetes, particularly insulin resistance, creates an environment conducive to liver inflammation and injury. High blood sugar and insulin levels can promote fat accumulation and oxidative stress within liver cells.

Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, explicitly identifies diabetes as one of the key hints explaining why some patients progress. The interplay between metabolic health and liver health is profound. Managing diabetes effectively is therefore a crucial component of managing NAFLD and potentially preventing its progression to NASH.

Genetic Factors in NASH Development

Emerging research highlights the important role of genetics in NASH susceptibility. Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, discusses a growing list of identified genes associated with the disease. These are not typically single-gene disorders but rather involve multiple genes, each with small effects.

Specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are single base pair changes in DNA, can collectively influence risk. These genetic variants can either increase or decrease an individual's likelihood of progressing from simple fatty liver to NASH. While not the sole cause, genetics contribute significantly to a patient's overall risk profile for advanced liver disease.

Family History Importance in NASH Diagnosis

A patient's family history serves as a critical clinical clue for physicians assessing NAFLD. Dr. Scott Friedman, MD, states that a history of NASH in a parent or sibling considerably raises his index of suspicion. This familial pattern is a surrogate for shared genetic risk factors.

Beyond genetics, family history also captures shared environmental influences. These include common dietary habits, gut microbiome composition, and lifestyle factors within a household. When a patient reveals a positive family history, it signals a greater probability that their own liver condition may be the more advanced NASH, warranting more thorough investigation and monitoring.

Clinical Implications for Patient Management

The distinction between NAFLD and NASH has direct consequences for patient care. Identifying patients with NASH is vital because they are the ones at highest risk for progressive liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and end-stage liver disease. This necessitates a more aggressive management approach focused on halting disease progression.

Dr. Scott Friedman, MD's insights guide clinicians to look beyond the presence of fat. The search for signs of inflammation and early scarring is paramount. Understanding risk drivers like diabetes and genetics allows for personalized risk stratification and early intervention strategies to improve long-term liver health outcomes.

Full Transcript

Dr. Anton Titov, MD: So non-alcoholic steatohepatitis is a progression of fatty liver disease.

Dr. Anton Titov, MD: How does NASH actually differ from NAFLD?

Dr. Scott Friedman, MD: NASH confers or implies that in addition to fat—remember, NAFLD is kind of an umbrella term. Most patients with NAFLD have plain fat. Sometimes we call that non-alcoholic fatty liver, but a subgroup will not only have fat, but they will have inflammation, injury to hepatocytes, and the beginning of the development of scarring.

It's the inflammation, injury, and scarring component that defines NASH. It is more than just simple liver fat alone.

Dr. Anton Titov, MD: What drives the progression from NAFLD to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH?

Dr. Scott Friedman, MD: We wish we knew. There are a lot of hints. For example, as I mentioned, most patients with fat in the liver have nothing but fat. That's not a cause for alarm. It certainly tells us that the patient is at risk for more advanced liver disease.

But again, most patients don't have fat. And yet that subset of patients who go on to develop NASH have an increased risk of complications. We don't know why some patients only have liver fat and others will progress to NASH.

As I mentioned, diabetes is one of the risk factors. There may also be genetic risk factors. They're not the most dominant cause of liver fat and progression to NASH.

But we do know that there is a growing list of genes with single base pair or DNA sequence changes that collectively can increase or decrease the risk of progression from fatty liver disease to NASH.

Certainly, family history—which is probably a surrogate for genetics, but also for a shared microbiome and diet—can be very important. So if a patient tells me that their parents had or one of their parents or a sibling had NASH, that raises my index of suspicion considerably that they too may have NASH and not just simply plain fat in the liver.